Compare with evidence

The Arena

Learn how to compare models, harnesses and complete stacks with transparent evidence.

A fair comparison starts with a clear task

A result depends on more than a model name. Compare like with like where possible; record what changed, what stayed fixed, and what could not be controlled.

  1. Record the configuration

    Keep the task, inputs, harness and model versions, instructions, tools, permissions and date with each experiment.

  2. Use a relevant rubric

    Measure the outcome for its field as well as system qualities such as reliability, cost where measurable, and completion of checks.

  3. Report limitations

    Keep failures, repetitions and uncertainty visible. Do not treat a single result or another provider’s score as a universal ranking.

    Learn about evaluations

Benchmarks are being prepared

There are no Dojo benchmark results on this page yet. Future comparisons need dated methods, sources and artifacts before they can be published.

Study the stack →

Explore the kata journey